Open to new experiences? Not very scrupulous? Queer? You are a lot more into consensual non-monogamy.

More individuals than before come into non-monogamous connections, and brand new investigation sheds light on which facets make people — and especially queer individuals — more likely to end up being into them. A
learn printed the other day when you look at the

Journal of Bisexuality

discovered that a lot more than any kind of personality aspects or attachment styles, being much more open (appreciative of different knowledge) and less conscientiousness (not to self-disciplined) can make queer men and women more prone to feel absolutely about and participate in consensually nonmonogamous interactions.

For direct people, there’s a connection between accessory positioning and consensual nonmonogamy: people who find themselvesn’t very more comfortable with intimacy with a partner (the connection avoidant) are far more open to it; whereas people that are vulnerable about somebody’s availableness, requirement reassurance, and generally are scared of abandonment (the accessory anxious) tend to be much less ready to accept it.

However for queer people, it’s more complicated than that. Consensual nonmonogamous relationships are typical among queers, and social norms like this can influence attitudes or habits. In accordance with earlier research observed from the writers, 35% of bisexual ladies and 21% of lesbian females reported having used consensual non-monogamy, in comparison to 16per cent of direct ladies. And once you set about receive from the a heteronormative relationship model, you might be very likely to get off a mononormative connection model, too. Connection elimination or anxiety isn’t really the complete image; for queer individuals, tradition and individuality are the thing that issue.

The analysis dedicated to just how individuality attributes — especially openness, conscientiousness, extraversion, agreeableness, and neuroticism — tend to be associated with good attitudes and inclination toward consensually non-monogamous interactions among sexual minorities. The writers recruited 108 LGB members online — 67per cent recognized as ladies, 62percent identified as bi- or pansexual, and 38% defined as gay or lesbian — to answer concerns to their attitudes toward romantic relationships.

The authors learned that getting more open made people much more attracted to consensual nonmonogamy, and write:

“[O]penness to brand new experiences and conscientiousness were strong predictors of appeal to multiple-partner connections among LGB individuals. Those who are apt to have active imaginations, an inclination for range, and a proclivity to take part in brand new experiences (i.e., high in openness) keep positive attitudes toward CNM and higher willingness to engage in these relationships.”

While becoming much more scrupulous had a tendency to cause people to less attracted to consensual nonmonogamy:

“[I]ndividuals whom commonly extremely organized, nice, cautious, and achievements pushed (i.e., saturated in conscientiousness) see CNM adversely and get less want to engage in CNM. Also, because very conscientiousness individuals have a tendency to deliberate, him or her have thoroughly regarded as just what these connections embodied (for example., believed very carefully on how all the CNM-related item would perform out) before supplying their unique attitudes. Although we wouldn’t initially hypothesize this result, this finding is largely in keeping with previous research showing reasonable conscientiousness to-be robustly (and cross-culturally) associated with curiosity about relationship nonexclusivity … quite, those rich in conscientiousness may see CNM interactions as having ill-defined relational programs. Very conscientious folks are significantly less aimed toward feeling looking for … and perhaps less ready to violate personal norms including monogamy.”

Typically is sensible, correct? In addition they discovered that, perhaps counterintuitively, getting extraverted produced somebody very likely to feel negatively about consensual nonmonogamy, and failed to impact readiness to use it out. Originally, the writers theorized that extraverts would delight in meeting new potential lovers and carrying out related personal tasks (I’m picturing all those poly family members brunches); just as one description, they note that extraverts frequently care more and more a situation feeling nice than about appreciating personal relationships, “that may be an underlying reason why extraversion had not been connected with good attitudes toward CNM.” In addition they keep in mind that past study effects on extraversion and sexual conduct are during the destination, and therefore subculture variations and norms could impact the results and want a lot more research.

Notably, in addition they found that, for queer individuals, exactly how somebody acts in routine contexts discloses a little more about whatever they’ll consider various kinds of connections, or if they’ll be interested in them, than see your face’s style within relationships: “Arguably, an individual’s connection positioning is far more regarding union procedures and high quality, whereas your personality factors are more effective worthy of understand attitudinal dispositions relating to varied relationships.”

This is basically the basic empirical learn to examine individuality attributes and emotions towards consensual nonmonogamy among friends currently a lot more into consensual nonmonogamy. That will be fairly neat! This study failed to protect how attitudes about or readiness to engage in multi-partner interactions translate to actually having multi-partner relationships, or what makes those relationships successful, basically hopefully a direction for potential analysis.